Canon 100/2.8L Macro is a lens with primary use in macro photography. This article is looking at how is it doing at longer distances to help decide suitability for landscape work.
Sharpness
Test Conditions
Test images were taken with Canon EOS 5D2, from tripod, using remote control and Live View (no mirror vibrations) on a rainy day. Contrast should not be directly compared due to possible variability of rain intensity. All shots were focused manually and individually with Live View at 10x magnification. Each f-stop was shot several times and sharpest sample selected for the final mosaics. All shots were taken from the same place, therefore shots from 85mm lens appear smallest and those from 135mm largest, sorry.
Postprocessing
The images are processed with ACR with default settings, i.e. no CA reduction, sharpening 25.
Center Sharpness
Click on the picture to see actual pixels.
The difference in contrast between the 100L and the other two lenses is most likely caused by heavier rain. The 135L is probably sharpest and the 100L least sharp, however the difference across the lenses does not seem to be significant, especially between the 100L and 85L. Note that the 100L has 4-stop image stabilizer, which will most likely reverse the order for handheld shots under 1/200s.
Corner Sharpness
Click on the picture to see actual pixels.
The 135L seems to be sharpest again, especially at 2.8 and the difference is bigger than in the center. The 100L suffers from chromatic aberration. The sharpness and CA can be easily fixed in ACR or Photoshop though. The following picture shows corner shot from the 100L @f2.8 with and without CA correction and some additional sharpening.


Samples
The following three samples were taken with 1/60s and image stabilizer. Click on the picture to see larger size. ![]()
The following image is a center crop with actual pixels.
Some images showing background and foreground blur.

To be continued…
